Nagi Hanatani vs Emma Ascanio Tarife Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 13 Jul at 01:32 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
N. Hanatani vs E. Ascanio Tarife

JPN
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ESP
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Hanatani 1 - 0 Tarife
They have played 3 sets in total, with Nagi Hanatani winning 2 and Emma Ascanio Tarife winning 1. The last match between Nagi Hanatani and Emma Ascanio Tarife was at the W75 Vitoria - Gasteiz, 13-07-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Nagi Hanatani getting the victory 4-6 6-2 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Hanatani | 1 |
| Tarife | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q1) W75 Vitoria - Gasteiz(07-13-25)
N. Hanatani vs E. A. Tarife H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $5,050 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 44.62% (286-355) | Career Total W/L | 25.00% (4-12) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
N. Hanatani vs E. A. Tarife Match Preview:
- Recent statistics indicate a significant difference in second serve performance: Tarife has not won any points, while Hanatani has a 39.9% success rate. Could this predict the match's outcome? Highly likely.
- Analyzing return game success, Tarife again falls short with 0% points won on their opponent's second serve, compared to Hanatani's impressive 49.83% success. First serve return stats further favor Hanatani, with 37.7% compared to Tarife's 0%.
- Under pressure, breakpoints appear to be a challenge for Tarife, who has saved none, whereas Hanatani has a saving rate of 48.04%. How might this influence live betting strategies? It suggests Hanatani may handle pressure better.
- Looking at overall performance, Tarife has secured only 36.36% of their matches over the past year, contrasting with Hanatani's higher win rate of 48.53%.
- Both players favor clay courts; however, Hanatani holds a better win ratio at 46% versus Tarife's 38%. Tarife struggles significantly on hard courts, winning none of their matches.
- In terms of tournament experience, Tarife has primarily competed at lower-tier events with a modest win rate of 37.5%, while Hanatani has performed at higher-level tournaments, maintaining a 50% win rate.
- Quality of opponents presents another disparity: Tarife has faced stronger opponents with an average rank of 80. Meanwhile, Hanatani has faced lower-ranked players, averaging 308.4.
- If the match extends to a deciding set, Tarife's record is troublesome, with no wins, whereas Hanatani boasts a 67% success rate, indicating a stronger finish under pressure.
- Break point conversion gives Hanatani another edge, with a conversion rate of 38.54% compared to Tarife's 0%, offering strategic insights for live betting.
Editorial Prediction (July 13, 2025, UTC):
The evidence from recent form highlights a stark contrast in the players' capabilities. Hanatani has consistently outperformed Tarife in critical statistical areas such as serve and return games, and handling break points.
On favored surfaces, Hanatani shows a higher win percentage on clay, adding to their advantage. The disparity in past competition level and opponent quality also indicates Hanatani's broader experience and ability to handle higher pressure situations.
Given these considerations, particularly Hanatani's proficiency in high-pressure scenarios and superior performance metrics across recent matches, Hanatani is the more likely winner in the upcoming encounter.
Nagi Hanatani vs Emma Ascanio Tarife Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
N. Hanatani vs E. A. Tarife H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 9 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 2:9:33 | Average Match Time | 2:9:33 |
| 67% (46/69) | 1st Serve % | 64% (47/74) |
| 61% (28/46) | 1st Serve Win % | 45% (21/47) |
| 43% (10/23) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (11/27) |
| 58% (7/12) | Break Pts Won % | 67% (4/6) |
| 57% (42/74) | Return Points Win % | 45% (31/69) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
N. Hanatani Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 6-3 6-2 | ||
R1 | L | 6-1 7-5 | ||
R1 | L | 4-6 6-4 6-3 | ||
R1 | L | 7-5 6-2 | ||
R1 | L | 7-5 7-6(3) | ||
E. A. Tarife Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 6-1 6-2 | ||
Q2 | L | 6-4 4-6 10-7 | ||
Q1 | L | 4-6 6-2 6-1 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-3 6-2 | ||
Q2 | L | 6-2 6-2 | ||

N. Hanatani vs E. A. Tarife Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 44.62% (286/355) | YTD Win/Loss | 25.00% (4/12) |
| 45.17% (654/794) | Sets Win/Loss | 31.43% (11/24) |
| 48.14% (6361/6853) | Games Win/Loss | 40.72% (125/182) |
| 44.44% (160/200) | Hard Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/4) |
| 46.10% (65/76) | Clay Win/Loss | 30.00% (3/7) |
| 45.54% (46/55) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 38.46% (15/24) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.02 | Aces Per Game | 0 |
| 138 | Aces Total | 0 |
| 0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.09 |
| 1735 | Total Double Faults | 14 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 517.93 | Average Opponent Rank | 151.19 |
| 64% (17778/27676) | 1st Serve % | 58% (101/174) |
| 56% (9899/17778) | 1st Serve Win % | 47% (47/101) |
| 42% (4179/9897) | 2nd Serve Win % | 26% (19/73) |
| 48% (1684/3534) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (7/16) |
| 46% (12862/27858) | Return Points Win % | 42% (68/162) |
| 25.00% (2/6) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 44.13% (218/276) | Challenger W/L | 16.67% (1/5) |
| 47.48% (66/73) | Futures W/L | 30.00% (3/7) |
| 44% (280/635) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 25% (4/16) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 59% (55/93) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 48% (82/170) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 83% (296/246) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 67% (6/4) |
| 17% (296/50) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 33% (6/2) |
| 11% (344/38) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (10/0) |